Le Crédit Lyonnais v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Réforme de l’État (C-388/11)
The ECJ published its judgment in this case on 12 September 2013. Le Crédit Lyonnais sought to include the interest on loans granted by its principal establishment to its branches established outside France, in the numerator and the denominator of the deductible proportion in calculating its rate of input VAT recovery.
The Court found that “Article 17(2) and (5) and Article 19(1) of the Sixth Directive must be interpreted as meaning that, in determining the deductible proportion of VAT applicable to it, a company, the principal establishment of which is situated in a Member State, may not take into account the turnover of its branches established in other Member States.”
In addition, it held that “Article 17(3)(a) and (c) and Article 19(1) of the Sixth Directive must be interpreted as meaning that, in determining the deductible proportion of VAT applicable to it, a company, the principal establishment of which is situated in a Member State, may not take into account the turnover of its branches established in third States” and Article 17(5) of the Sixth Directive must be interpreted as not permitting a Member State to adopt a rule for the calculation of the deductible proportion per sector of business of a company subject to tax which authorises that company to take into account the turnover of a branch established in another Member State or in a third State.” Click here for the full judgment.
HMRC v Paul Newey trading as Ocean Finance (C-653/11)
The ECJ delivered its judgment in this case on 20 June 2013. It related to the abuse of rights principle and the extent to which contractual terms are decisive in identifying the supplier and recipient in the context of a supply of services. The Court held that whilst the contractual terms are a factor to be taken into account, such terms are not decisive in identifying the supplier and recipient of a supply of services. “They may in particular be disregarded if it becomes apparent that hey do not reflect economic and commercial reality, but constitute a wholly artificial arrangement which does not reflect economic reality and was set up with the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage” and this is for the national court to decide. The full judgment can be accessed here.
EU Commission v Ireland (C-108/11)
This case related to the application of the reduced rate of VAT of 4.8% to supplies of greyhounds and horses not intended for the preparation of foodstuffs, to the hire of horses and certain insemination services. On 14 March 2013 the ECJ published its decision.
Article 110 of the VAT Directive provides that Member States which zero-rated or applied reduced rates lower than the minimum at 1 January 1991 may continue to do so, but they must have been adopted for “clearly defined social reasons” and be “for the benefit of the final consumer”.
The Commission argued that the reduced rates were not adopted for clearly defined social reasons and were not for the benefit of the final consumer i.e. the two cumulative conditions set out in Article 110 were not satisfied. The Court held that the conditions were not fulfilled. There may be changes to such VAT rates in the imminent Finance Bill. Read the full judgment here.
BGŻ Leasing sp. Z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie (C-224/11)
The judgment of the Court was delivered on 17 January 2013 and dealt with the VAT treatment of insurance cover in the context of leasing services. BGŻ Leasing provided leasing services together with insurance for a leased item and where it acquired cover from an insurer and recharged the cost to the customer, it treated the recharges as being exempt from VAT.
The first question was whether the leasing and insurance services were a single supply of services. The Court held that in this case the services must in principal be regarded as distinct and independent supplies of services for VAT purposes. But it is up to the referring court to decide if it is a single supply or independent supplies. Where the services are regarded as separate independent supplies then the same taxable amount is not applicable to both.
The second question, on the assumption that the services are distinct, was whether re-invoicing of the insurance services was exempt from VAT. The Court held that “where the lessor insures the leased item itself and re-invoices the exact cost of the insurance to the lessee, such a transaction constitutes, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, an insurance transaction within the meaning of Article 135(1)(a) of the VAT Directive”.
So in the circumstances of the case, a supply of leasing services and a supply of insurance services were supplied, each with their own VAT treatment and taxable amount. The full judgment can be found by clicking here.
Revenue have advised that a substantial redevelopment of the current RTD filing system will be delivered in a number of stages, commencing in the period late-2013 to early-2014. The proposed changes to the RTD will include a simplified RTD format in ROS, while the paper-based RTD filing option which is currently available for a very limited number of approved VAT traders will cease. Continue reading
Finance Act 2013 was signed into law on 27 March 2013. There were a number of VAT changes introduced and the detailed Notes for Guidance published by Revenue are available by clicking here.
An updated leaflet on the VAT Treatment of Dances has been published by Revenue. The promotion of and admission to dances is liable to VAT at the standard rate. For VAT purposes a dance includes all public dances, that is, functions or gatherings where the principal activity is dancing, and which are open to the public on payment of an admission charge, or on pre-purchase of a ticket. Examples of what constitutes a dance are functions arranged and promoted as dances, and activities consisting of dancing carried on in nightclubs, discotheques, public houses, and similar establishments. Click here.
Important changes concerning the VAT rules relating to eServices and Broadcasting will come into effect on 1 January 2015. A new scheme, the Electronic Services Scheme (ESS), relating to such supplies made by suppliers established outside the EU to private individuals in the EU will also be introduced. The VAT Information Leaflet outlining these changes “eServices and Broadcasting” has been published by Revenue. Click here.
The Revenue have just issued a new information leaflet on Education and Training. This leaflet deals with the VAT treatment of education and vocational training or retraining provided by institutions, organisations, or companies both in the state and private sectors.- click here